TL;DR
- This guide compares agencies that design websites for Austin businesses across strengths, typical project fit, and delivery approach.
- Use the comparison table to shortlist 3 to 5 options, then validate with recent case studies and references.
- The right partner depends on your stage (new site vs redesign), platform choice (WordPress, Webflow, Shopify), and content readiness.
- Expect trade-offs between speed vs depth, boutique focus vs delivery capacity, and template builds vs custom systems.
- A structured selection process reduces scope creep, timeline slips, and inconsistent design outcomes.
Why partner selection matters
A website often functions as the first high-intent touchpoint for buyers, candidates, and partners. If the information architecture is unclear, the pages feel slow, or the content hierarchy is confusing, trust drops quickly. A well-matched agency helps prevent issues such as unclear navigation, weak messaging hierarchy, inconsistent mobile layouts, and sites that become hard to maintain after launch.
This comparison is designed to help you evaluate fit and evidence, not marketing claims.
How to evaluate a web design agency
Use these criteria when shortlisting:
- Project type fit: marketing site, SaaS website, ecommerce, or redesign
- UX depth: information architecture, page hierarchy, accessibility, responsive behavior
- Build approach: Webflow, WordPress, Shopify, or custom front-end
- Performance hygiene: Core Web Vitals readiness, image strategy, clean components
- SEO readiness: crawlable structure, templates, metadata workflow, content formatting
- Delivery model: workshops, revision rounds, QA checklists, handoff documentation
- Evidence: comparable portfolio items, measurable outcomes when available, references
Comparison table
| Rank | Company | Best for | Specialization | Common stack |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Creole Studios | Startups and SMBs needing design plus build support | UX-led website design and delivery support | React, Next.js, WordPress, Shopify |
| 2 | Lounge Lizard | Brand-led websites with strong creative direction | Brand identity and conversion-focused UI | WordPress, Shopify, HubSpot CMS |
| 3 | GLIDE | Mission-driven and content-heavy websites | Accessibility-forward, structured layouts | WordPress, Shopify |
| 4 | UPQODE | Growth teams wanting modern UX with SEO hygiene | Mobile-first UX with SEO-ready builds | WordPress, WooCommerce, React |
| 5 | Lucid Crew Web Design | Local businesses needing maintainable websites | Practical layouts, ongoing support | WordPress, HTML, CSS, JavaScript |
| 6 | Digitech Web Design | Businesses optimizing for lead generation | CRO-driven layouts and messaging | WordPress, Shopify, React |
| 7 | Arrow Media | Storytelling and visual-first brands | Visual storytelling and brand expression | WordPress, Webflow |
| 8 | BrandWorx Austin | Boutique branding and local market fit | Tailored brand systems for SMBs | WordPress, Squarespace, Shopify |
| 9 | Audion Media | Multimedia-heavy experiences | Video, audio, interactive content | WordPress, Drupal |
| 10 | Big Gorilla Design | SMBs needing a strong baseline website | Branding plus SEO fundamentals | WordPress, Shopify, WooCommerce |
Company snapshots
1) Creole Studios
Fit: Teams that want UX-led website design with the option to extend into broader product delivery. This is relevant when a website is tied to positioning, landing page iteration, or a longer roadmap where templates and consistency matter.
Strength to validate: Responsive QA consistency, component reuse, and documentation quality. This includes how navigation states, page sections, and reusable blocks behave across breakpoints so future pages do not drift visually.
Practical check: Ask for examples of sitemap to wireframe mapping, page template definitions, and the final handoff package (design specs, reusable components, and content guidance).
If you want to compare how they run website engagements (scope, process, and what gets delivered), review their website delivery support details.
2) Lounge Lizard
Lounge Lizard is known for brand-focused web design, helping businesses create memorable digital identities with strong creative direction. Their work blends strategy, design, and marketing to support clarity and conversion.
Typical fit: Brand-heavy marketing sites and campaign-led redesigns.
Validate: How they translate brand concepts into navigation and content hierarchy.
3) GLIDE
GLIDE builds purpose-driven websites for nonprofits, healthcare providers, and small businesses. Their focus is clean layouts, accessibility, and maintainable content workflows.
Typical fit: Content-heavy sites where governance and accessibility are non-negotiable.
Validate: Accessibility QA and publishing workflows.
4) UPQODE
UPQODE creates modern websites designed with SEO hygiene and mobile-first structure. Their strength is clean UI, strong UX fundamentals, and performance-aware builds.
Typical fit: Growth teams that want UX plus SEO-ready structure.
Validate: Template structure and launch readiness for performance.
5) Lucid Crew Web Design
Lucid Crew builds easy-to-manage websites for local businesses and growing SMBs. Their approach focuses on clarity, simple layouts, and ongoing maintenance options.
Typical fit: SMB sites that need reliability and long-term upkeep.
Validate: Support coverage and maintenance terms.
6) Digitech Web Design
Digitech emphasizes conversion-focused websites supported by content strategy and CRO thinking. Their projects often focus on lead flow and clearer user journeys.
Typical fit: Service businesses and B2B brands optimizing for leads.
Validate: CRO process and how post-launch iterations are handled.
7) Arrow Media
Arrow Media builds storytelling-driven websites for lifestyle brands and startups. Their work tends to prioritize visual identity and engaging content structure.
Typical fit: Brands where storytelling is central to differentiation.
Validate: Page performance with media-heavy layouts.
8) BrandWorx Austin
BrandWorx delivers boutique websites that reflect local market needs and brand identity. Their focus is tailored execution for SMBs.
Typical fit: SMBs wanting a hands-on boutique team.
Validate: Depth of UX work beyond visuals.
9) Audion Media
Audion Media specializes in multimedia-rich experiences that integrate video, podcasts, and interactive elements.
Typical fit: Education, media, and content-led brands.
Validate: Maintainability and CMS governance for multimedia.
10) Big Gorilla Design
Big Gorilla Design builds visually strong websites with attention to branding and baseline SEO hygiene.
Typical fit: SMBs wanting a strong foundation site and room to scale.
Validate: Template scalability and consistency over time.
How to choose the right agency
- Define the site’s primary job
Lead generation, ecommerce, hiring, product education, credibility, or support. Prioritize one to avoid diluted design decisions. - Select the platform early
WordPress for content governance, Webflow for speed and visual control, Shopify for ecommerce. Late platform changes usually create rework. - Make scope boundaries explicit
Copywriting, photography, motion, SEO setup, analytics, integrations, accessibility. Unclear scope is a frequent cause of timeline slips. - Evaluate process quality, not only visuals
Ask for artifacts: sitemap, wireframes, template list, revision policy, QA checklist, and handoff documentation. - Use a short discovery phase if uncertainty is high
A small scoped engagement helps confirm collaboration quality and decision velocity.
Risks and trade-offs
- Visual polish vs clarity: Overdesigned pages can reduce comprehension and conversion.
- Speed vs depth: Fast builds may skip information architecture work that prevents usability issues later.
- Template vs custom: Templates reduce cost but can limit differentiation and scalability.
- Launch vs maintain: If updates are difficult, the site will stagnate, even if the launch is strong.
Conclusion
A comparison list works when it supports consistent evaluation. Shortlist a few agencies, validate fit against your platform and scope, and confirm evidence with recent work. This approach reduces rework and results in a website that remains maintainable after launch.
FAQs
1) How do I shortlist agencies quickly?
Start with project type fit and platform alignment, then review 2 to 3 comparable portfolio examples.
2) How long does a typical website take?
Standard sites often land in a 3 to 8 week range, while complex ecommerce or multi-template builds can take longer depending on content readiness.
3) What should be included in a proposal?
Deliverables by phase, revision policy, page templates, accessibility scope, performance expectations, and post-launch support terms.
4) How do I reduce scope creep?
Define who owns copy and assets, lock templates early, and use a clear change-control method for new requirements.
5) Do agencies include SEO by default?
Many include structural SEO hygiene, but keyword strategy and content programs are often separate. Confirm the exact scope in writing.
30 mins free Consulting
Canada
Hong Kong
Global
Love we get from the world